|
|
|
|
Overview At the first full Initiative meeting on October 11, 2001, members generated a long list of questions and hypotheses regarding education and development of children in Red Bank. This list was generated without regard to methods or precision – the idea was to simply get every possible issue on the table. Then, the group, led by the Consultant, engaged in a structured process to select the most relevant and useful areas for further investigation. It is this process that determined the focus of the Initiative’s fact-finding efforts. Using the selection process designed by the Consultant, the Initiative members divided the questions and hypotheses into four categories: items to discard These are questions or hypotheses which group members agreed were of little use or relevance. items to store for future consideration These are questions or hypotheses which some group members felt were of little use or significance, but other group members felt might be useful at some time. items to accept without further investigation These are useful and relevant questions that could be answered by the group with a high level of certainty, or useful and relevant hypotheses that the group felt could be accepted without further proof. items that required further investigation These are questions and hypotheses that the group deemed useful and relevant, but the group felt that more information was needed to answer the questions or validate the hypotheses. These items became the focus of the fact-finding efforts by Initiative members
The questions and hypotheses fell into four broad subject categories. Immediately following the October 11, 2001 meeting, members selected one of four fact-finding teams associated with a subject category. The subject categories are:
Each team was charged with
The results of each team’s work is presented in the following pages. The results of each team’s fact-finding efforts are represented in terms of answers to the questions or hypotheses originally assigned to the team. Fact-finding information that supports each report can be found in the attachments.
Internal School Environment Team Report Team Leader: Mike Stasi All Team Members
Disposition of Assigned Questions and Hypotheses
Accepted, no further data-gathering required When children feel safe at school and at home there will be a positive impact on their learning and development. Red Bank community assets do not adequately address the education and development needs of its Hispanic families.
Stored for possible future investigation What professional development programs are available for educators?
Further investigation required Do teachers in public schools feel that they are under fire? To what extent are they resistant to change? What is the impact of the structure of educational institutions in Red Bank on student learning?
Fact-finding sources and methods
Fact-finding results Do teachers in public schools feel that they are under fire? In some ways, yes. Teacher focus group discussions reveal concerns in several areas, as indicated below:
To what extent are they resistant to change? Most teachers don’t seem to be resistant to change. In general, teachers seem to want clear and consistent leadership and direction, and help in solving the problems they believe they are facing. Teachers want to be involved in school planning and improvement processes, and want to collaborate with teachers from other buildings and districts on issues like professional development and best practices.
What is the impact of the structure of educational institutions in Red Bank on student learning? The team has chosen to defer answering this question until the results of the administrator interviews are compiled and evaluated.
Vision statements
Proposed improvement strategies
Student Performance Team Report Team Leader: John McMahon/W. David Tarver* All Team Members
*W. David Tarver succeeded John McMahon as team leader in March, 2002.
Disposition of Assigned Questions and Hypotheses
Accepted, no further investigation required (none)
Stored for possible future investigation (none)
Further investigation required What are the long and short-term effects of the practice of "social promotion" in Red Bank schools on its children and on its schools? Students who graduate from Red Bank Public Schools are competitive with other communities at every level.
Fact-finding sources and methods
Red Bank Charter School charter renewal application, 2001 Red Bank Borough Schools rebuttal to Charter School renewal application, 2001
Fact-finding results What are the long and short-term effects of the practice of "social promotion" in Red Bank schools on its children and on its schools? Schools policy favors promotion of all students, with early intervention for students who are not performing at grade level. The policy has not been applied consistently. Intervention methods have not been as effective as they need to be, often leading to promotion of students who are not prepared for the next grade level.
Students who graduate from Red Bank Public Schools are competitive with other communities at every level. Results of state-mandated standardized tests show clearly that students from Red Bank schools are not competitive with students from the other sending districts to the regional high school (Little Silver, Shrewsbury). Test results also show that, on average, Red Bank students perform significantly below the state average. The regional high school district is reluctant to release data that shows the performance of Red Bank students as compared to the performance of students from the other sending districts. Anecdotal evidence suggests that Red Bank children do not fare well at the regional high school, in comparison with their peers from Little Silver and Shrewsbury. Such evidence also suggests that participation by Red Bank students is much less than their peers even in non-academic areas such as sports and music programs.
Vision Statements
Proposed Improvement Strategies
Community Characteristics, Families and Student Learning Team Report Team Leader: Dr. Michael Rush/Charles Hughes* All Team Members
*Charles Hughes succeeded Dr. Michael Rush as team leader in March, 2002. Disposition of Assigned Questions and Hypotheses
Accepted, no further investigation required Increased parental involvement in the education of their children will increase the outcomes for children. When Red Bank children feel safe at school and at home there will be a positive impact on their learning and development. An increase in parental expectation for their children’s success in school will result in increased student performance.
Stored for possible future investigation What are the educational levels achieved by parents of Red Bank school children? How many Red Bank children live in intact families? How many Red Bank children eat 3 well-balance meals per day? Do Red Bank students live in housing that is sufficient for facilitating study?
Further investigation required Families in Red Bank are provided with the resources to raise and educate their children. What actions can the Initiative take to get Local Businesses and Community resources involved in improving education and development of Red Bank children?
Fact-finding sources and methods
Fact-finding results Families in Red Bank are provided with the resources to raise and educate their children. The Community Characteristics committee conducted a survey of parents who attended parent-teacher conferences in the fall of 2001. Overall 80 % of the parents surveyed were in agreement that their family has been provided most of the resources they feel are needed to enhance the development and academic opportunities of their children. Among Latino parents the rate of agreement (55%) was significantly less than that of the total surveyed population. Based on school, the agreement rates were 77% Primary School, 80% Middle School and 87% Charter School. The top five Areas of Need most frequently cited across all school populations were:
Among Latino parents, in addition to the above, bilingual communication services, Drug and Alcohol Counseling and Health, Dental and Vision Care Insurance, were most frequently cited. With regard to schools, African-American and Latino focus group parents cite a lack of two-way communications with the borough schools. Latino parents also cite a lack of Spanish-speaking personnel in the schools. Both groups indicate a feeling of "us vs. them" in relation to borough schools staff. From the perspective of African American and Latino parents, increasing the number of minority educators in the schools of Red Bank, would contribute greatly to addressing some of their concerns about school-parent relations.
What actions can the Initiative take to get Local Businesses and Community resources involved in improving education and development of Red Bank children? The Initiative seeks to have businesses other community resources:
Vision Statements
Proposed Improvement Strategies
Community Asset Performance Team Report Team Leader: Dick Pollock All Team Members
Disposition of Assigned Questions and Hypotheses
Accepted, no further data-gathering required Pre-school education and development programs are beneficial to children’s later success. Red Bank community assets do not adequately address the education and development needs of its Hispanic families. The Red Bank community’s "two-town" approach to provisioning it’s resources results in inadequate access for black and Hispanic families.
Stored for possible future investigation (none)
Further investigation required The competition between two public schools (Traditional and Charter) improves the effectiveness of Red Bank children. What is the impact of participation in extra-curricular, after-school and cultural activities on minority and non-minority student education and development outcomes?
Fact-finding sources and methods
Fact-finding results The competition between two public schools (Traditional and Charter) improves the effectiveness of Red Bank children. The Community Asset Performance team did not collect data to confirm or refute this hypothesis. Several findings did arise as a result of the team’s data-gathering effort, and these may shed some light on the issue of competition between the borough and charter schools: The competition between the schools has been a contentious and divisive issue, especially since the Charter School was granted permission by the state board of education to expand its program. Originally, the Charter School provided grades 4-8. With the granting of the expansion request, as of September, 2002, the school will serve grades K-8. In addition, class size will grow from 16 to 18 students. In focus group sessions with non-Charter School parents, some parents expressed a belief that the Charter School unfairly takes resources that would otherwise be allocated to the Borough Schools. The results of focus groups with Charter School parents seem to show a high degree of satisfaction with school performance, and good communications between parents and school staff. Discussions with Charter School teachers indicate a general satisfaction with school leadership. In evaluating the focus group results, it is important to keep in mind the relative size of the Red Bank Borough Schools and the Red Bank Charter School. As of the end of the 1999-2000 school year, the Borough Schools served 678 students, and the Charter School served 82 students.
What is the impact of participation in extra-curricular, after-school and cultural activities on minority and non-minority student education and development outcomes? The team determined, by reviewing publicly available research, that participation in the above types of activities has a positive impact on education and development outcomes.
Vision Statements All Red Bank children and families will have knowledge of, access to, and willingness to embrace/use/participate in after and out of school programs, counseling, and nutritional and medical services.
Proposed Improvement Strategies
|
|
|